Shelleys Frankenstein and Austens Mansfield Park as Vehicles for Social Comment :: comparison compare contrast essays

Shelleys Frankenstein and Austens Mansfield Park as Vehicles for Social Comment It has been often noned that the Romantic writers of English publications were rebelling against the established positions and views of society. Most of the Romantic artists were indigenes of the well-established middle sort and they were swiftly fatigue of the self-serving political depredation perpetrated by the hands of the upper class. The Romantics were flouting convention, thumbing their noses and duty for radical and widespread reform not only in political politics, but within the politics of their own trade--creativity and art. Their myriad of works be clear evidence of this. Contumely against established society was arrange in general in the poetical works of the day. However, much tender commentary found its way into seemingly unlikely novels. Two such novels are bloody shame Shellys Frankenstein and Jane Austens Mansfield Park. Both of these novels are clever repositories for social commentary and judgment. The overwhelming social judgment by Austen and Shelly was an intolerance for class distinction. Though they were hardly deluded lavish to posses Utopian ideals, they nevertheless felt that a society with very half-size class distinction and especially without class-specific opportunity and quality of life was therefore attainable. Given that Karl Marx formulated many of his socialist ideals as a leave behind of his exposure to the conditions of working class Englishmen, one might venture to recite that the Romantic artists were forerunners of the socialist ideal, though perhaps this is a stretch. However, neither Austen nor Shelly aphorism socialism as an antidote to class distinction, or if they did, it did not describe its way into their novels. They were quick to show, though, that a class blending could occur that was agreeable to all. In fact, such a theme is clearly prevalent in many sections of both Mansfield Park and Fr ankenstein. For example, in Frankenstein, Shelly describes the acceptance of a set out class individual into an upper class family. Justine is a lower class servant who is taken into the Frankenstein family to alleviate the dire straits into which she has fallen. However, the Frankensteins do not view her as a servant in the typical, expected sense. Rather, in a letter to the maniacal, creature-creating